Closed fzimmermann89 closed 1 year ago
Dear Felix,
Indeed you are right, this was a rookie Python mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. We fixed this problem now. We have checked the convergence using the correct jacobian and the wrong one, and found out that this doesn't change the result. Even the convergence time doesn't change a lot.
Thanks again for your keen eye, David
Yes, for small a small stepsize this should not effect the results, as it converges to the same limit.
But thanks for fixing it, and thank you for the interesting work!
First of all, thank you for providing the source code!
While skimming through the code, I noticed https://github.com/imphys/MRF_undersampling_optimization/blob/3d462202ea6a05a54f01e2bb810b05aeb4dfb896/UEE_phase.py#L690 Doesn't this constitute a bug? The assignment does not produce a copy, but just a new referenceto the data. So for each direction, the step is added to the same data. Instead, for each direction it should be added to the original data. I think that there should be an explicit copy. I might be missing something, but as is, this seems to result in a wrong jacobian.
Have a great day, Felix