As already discussed with Theophile, there were a few duplicated issues in the BCUL data, for which the duplicated identifier was not valid anymore (removed form the API).
Most of them had been identified during the canonical (or rebuilt) ingestion, but three were remaining in TouSuIl (Le Touriste - la Suisse Illustrée).
The issues are the following:
287545, 1866-09-01
287530, 1866-08-01
287477, 1867-02-01
Unfortunately, they were processed after their correct counterpart, so the page files were overwritten with faulty information.
Fixing them by hand is possible, but could be prone to errors.
It seems more adapted to re-ingest the two specific years of the BCUL data as part of the next ingestion, to ensure this problem is fixed.
Currently, the issues were simply ignored from the MySQL ingestion.
As already discussed with Theophile, there were a few duplicated issues in the BCUL data, for which the duplicated identifier was not valid anymore (removed form the API). Most of them had been identified during the canonical (or rebuilt) ingestion, but three were remaining in
TouSuIl(Le Touriste - la Suisse Illustrée). The issues are the following:Unfortunately, they were processed after their correct counterpart, so the page files were overwritten with faulty information. Fixing them by hand is possible, but could be prone to errors. It seems more adapted to re-ingest the two specific years of the BCUL data as part of the next ingestion, to ensure this problem is fixed.
Currently, the issues were simply ignored from the MySQL ingestion.