Open cyqsimon opened 7 months ago
This issue is just to document my findings. Any help (e.g. debugging, reproduction attempt, etc.) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I test myself, It's lower performance than iftop
if network traffic is huge
iperf3 output
htop shows the CPU utilization is too high
@handewo Hmm. This is interesting but it's a separate problem - please open another issue so we can keep the discussion focused.
Meanwhile, can you please run iperf3
with -R
flag to see if bandwhich can detect that traffic on your box? Much thanks.
@handewo Hmm. This is interesting but it's a separate problem - please open another issue so we can keep the discussion focused.
Meanwhile, can you please run
iperf3
with-R
flag to see if bandwhich can detect that traffic on your box? Much thanks.
bandwhich detect as expected if run iperf3
with '-R'
I ran iperf3
and bandwhich
on platform: almalinux 9.2 and iperf3
as server on Linux Mint 21.1
TLDR
I set up an iperf3 on a remote machine with
iperf3 -s
, and connected to it on my local box withiperf3 -c <ADDR>
. bandwhich is able to detect the upload traffic as expected.However, if I connect to it with
iperf3 -R -c <ADDR>
, so that the server is sending data to the client instead, bandwhich shows very little traffic (which I suppose is the control channel).Screenshots
Here you can see bandwhich side-by-side with btop, which is able to detect both upload and download traffic correctly. There's obviously something wrong.