Address remaining review comments from @trishankkarthik

[lukpueh]

@SantiagoTorres partially addressed an out-of-band specification review from @trishankkarthik in #6. As per the PR description (Oct 2017) the following items remained:

• [ ] There are too many terms upfront
• [ ] Sections 2-3 are particularly redundant
• [ ] More pictures and diagrams are necessary (ASK)
• [ ] POSIX timestamps
• [ ] Point 8 of minor readability issues (ask trishank)
• [ ] Why is there mention of private keys in the metadata?
• [ ] Commands sound dangerous, are clients expected to run arbitrary commands? (ASK/Debate/FAQ)
  • [ ] What about rollback attacks? (Elaborate/question)

[trishankkarthik]

cc @trishankatdatadog

[adityasaky]

@trishankkarthik @trishankatdatadog could you review this and see if we still need to address the points here? I think several points have been fixed over the years.

[trishankatdatadog]

I think we can close this for now and address new comments afresh. Thanks!

[adityasaky]

Cheers, thanks!