search

inab / benchmarking-data-model

OpenEBench Benchmarking Data Model repository
Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International
2 stars 7 forks source link

Metrics Visualization #98

Closed javi-gv94 closed 1 year ago

javi-gv94 commented 5 years ago

Currently, we have not specified which metrics we want to visualize for a specific challenge, and how to visualize them. For instance, in the case of 2D visualization, we should know which metric is represented in the X axis and which one in Y. Should the data model cover this? For instance at the challenge level.

(I am not sure if this is related with #97)

javi-gv94 commented 5 years ago

Should this be considered in the metricsCategory schema created in e3bc8d02271130cdce0618e90e9dbeb32dc14cd0? e.g. for TCGA we would have a MetricsCategory 'Precision-vs-recall', which would be linked to a 2D visualization and specify which metric is represented in the X axis and which one in Y. For communities that have simple results/metrics, we could use a 'generic' metrics category.

jmfernandez commented 3 years ago

As this is beyond the data model, but related to their primary users, I guess it is better modeled through the extendable _metadata mechanism. I'm leaving this issue open, in order to give it a thought on platform consolidation.

jmfernandez commented 1 year ago

Fixed at https://github.com/inab/OEB_level2_data_migration