Closed elbrujohalcon closed 6 years ago
As @michalwski correctly points out in #137 comments, timer:sleep is not a good thing to use, specially not in CI tests, that's why CT provides ct:sleep as a replacement. But we know better, we have ktn_task:wait_for so that's the one we should use.
timer:sleep
ct:sleep
ktn_task:wait_for
@elbrujohalcon could you create a PR with the same change to the rel-3.1 branch? If not I'll do it anyway.
rel-3.1
@michalwski stay tuned… PR is coming your way today or tomorrow :)
As @michalwski correctly points out in #137 comments,
timer:sleep
is not a good thing to use, specially not in CI tests, that's why CT providesct:sleep
as a replacement. But we know better, we havektn_task:wait_for
so that's the one we should use.