Open joellebel opened 7 years ago
I definitely say keep the fields around (except 'help me ID this species') but it's fine to have them collapse.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, joellebel notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi all -
While observing users, I think both Alex and I have noticed the confirmation screen looks a bit overwhelming, especially to new folks. It also contains fields that are rarely used even by advanced users. (Feel free to check the stats on that as I have don't have them.)
I was curious what a simpler conf. screen would look like by collapsing the lesser used fields (geoprivacy, captive and projects). See below 2 sketches...
[image: image] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11527994/17148452/1afba31c-531c-11e6-8c7b-86253881c9e1.png
These are just sketches to get an idea of space and simplicity. I can certainly mock up what it would look like expanded. Just wanted to gauge folks' feedback. (@alexshepard https://github.com/alexshepard @kueda https://github.com/kueda @loarie https://github.com/loarie @pleary https://github.com/pleary and anyone else)
I'm not sure how complicated the expand/collapse thing is to code on this screen. @alexshepard https://github.com/alexshepard could you also comment on that. Tnx.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/inaturalist/INaturalistIOS/issues/306, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG1tk8VSZ3DkGwb1MU90ZnepCNgMaB-Oks5qZkU8gaJpZM4JVZdK .
Charlie Hohn Montpelier, Vermont
I definitely like this general idea. I have a slight preference for option A but I couldn't explain why other than that it feels more integrated with the rest of the screen.
ID please will be gone shortly, @naturalistcharlie ;)
Accordioning the rows won't be difficult.
Accordioning the rows won't be difficult.
Ok. Because we could also do something like this...
In this mock up the geoprivacy, captive and projects options would be on a new screen that slides in from the right.
If you don't have a UX reason to prefer one over the other, I'd prefer the accordion approach as it's technically simpler.
Ok. Cool. Yes, I prefer accordion too. Just wanted us to see all options. I will do a mock up of what it looks like expanded.
looks fine to me
ok. cool. I'll mock up the expanded view real quick.
If you don't have a UX reason to prefer one over the other, I'd prefer the accordion approach as it's technically simpler.
I prefer the accordion approach.
Here's a couple mock ups for the expanded view. Disregard the fact I repeated the Captive/Cultivated row. Pretend it's Projects. I just don't have an iPhone 6 anymore to take screenshots from and this original design was done with an iPhone 6.
This has "More Options" highlighted when open...
Honestly don't have big preference between the two.
Hi all -
While observing users, I think both Alex and I have noticed the confirmation screen looks a bit overwhelming, especially to new folks. It also contains fields that are rarely used even by advanced users. (Feel free to check the stats on that as I have don't have them.)
I was curious what a simpler conf. screen would look like by collapsing the lesser used fields (geoprivacy, captive and projects). See below 2 sketches...
These are just sketches to get an idea of space and simplicity. I can certainly mock up what it would look like expanded. Just wanted to gauge folks' feedback. (@alexshepard @kueda @loarie @pleary and anyone else)
I'm not sure how complicated the expand/collapse thing is to code on this screen. @alexshepard could you also comment on that. Tnx.