search

inband-oam / ietf

IETF drafts
7 stars 15 forks source link

Data draft: Evolve text on SR example #100

Open brockners opened 5 years ago

brockners commented 5 years ago

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/v4a75IXTi8GKfDl_Ddm_5WN6gxs

1. "Note that not every node in an IOAM domain needs to be an IOAM transit node. For example, a Segment Routing deployment might require the segment routing path to be verified. In that case, only the SR nodes would also be IOAM transit nodes rather than all nodes . " 1) How to distinguish if all nodes or SR nodes will record IOAM info? If the both is necessary, how to process? 2) For SRv6 the SID list can be kept in the SRH. But for SR-MPLS, the Label/SID will be popped and the SID list cannot be kept. Would there be different process for SR-MSPL and SRv6. 3) In order to reduce the complexity, could the part be discussed in some SR iOAM draft instead of this draft?

brockners commented 5 years ago

Addressed in https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/119 New text does not use SR as example.