Closed peterdesmet closed 8 years ago
Pueraria montana
is on the T0 list, but Pueraria montana var. lobata
(2977647) is not. That works fine for GBIF searches (which automatically searches for children), but an search in recorder will probably miss that variety + synonyms (according to GBIF) linking to it, such as Pueraria lobata
.
@timadriaens Should we add Pueraria montana var. lobata
to T0?
yes please, it's kudzu http://www.gbif.org/species/2977647; official EU list publication mentions "Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. var. lobata (Willd.) (Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi)" look at the notes on taxonomy ib the CABI compendium
Now added to recorder list: 19716c5951dc3dea507774939973ed30e78013e9.
It's hard to solve the 6 none-matches without manually altering names, so I'm closing this issue.
We've completely reworked the GBIF name matching of name-server names. The T0 species are now filtered with the aggregated-checklist. If we compare this with the original matching in this old file, there are a couple of differences:
6 keys were added
This caused by names previously not matching GBIF (fixed by the August update) or new acceptedKeys included in T0.
26 keys were removed
5 keys have become an accepted names and are not included in T0
7 names no longer match GBIF
Maybe because we weren't using
strict
matching before:14 names that don't pass synonym matching