Closed LienReyserhove closed 3 years ago
I checked the stations for project Zeeschelde
(with s-
in station name), 2012_leopoldkanaal
(with bh-
in station name), and the three Westerschelde
arrays (with ws-
in station name). Here are the station names that need to be changed:
s-4c
is the station name, and not de-3
. However, could you check that the deployment date of this station is later than 27/04/2015?LEOPOLDKANAAL MONDING BOEREKREEK
is bh-9
(missing deployment_station_name
field in second table)me-7
has M-7
in column deployment_station_name
.Voorhaven Zeebrugge
is not s-2
. I would think it is bh-2
, but @LienReyserhove could you give me the coordinates of deployment with Voorhaven Zeebrugge
so I can verify?@jreubens could you check the station names for the bpns?
@IPauwels could you check the station names for the Albert Canal? Especially the receivers involved in the VPS study in Ham (with HH
and st
in the station name)? The others, with ak-
in the station name are correct.
@fwaumans on which level do we have each of this names? I guess deploy_station_name is on deployment level and the relevant one...
I missed this issue. We keep track of station name on
I think the one on deployment level is the most relevant one.
vliz.detections_view
includes two fields forstation_name
:station_name
anddeployment_station_name
. I would expect that these values of these fields are identical. This is not the case for the following stations though. Could this be corrected in the database?station_name
is more or less similar todeployment_station_name
station_name
is deviating fromdeployment_station_name