Add basic functionality of `get_records()`

[PietrH]

get_records() is now in a minimally functional state.

What works:

• [x] You can get all records for a custom inspection (i.e. Vespa-Watch
• [x] All columns get the same labels as they have in the interface
• [x] These labels are converted into r friendly equivalents, so underscores instead of spaces
• [x] The package will retry 3 times if the request fails

What is missing:

• [ ] Any filtering like 2. Valideren
• [ ] The function is completely uncovered by unit tests
• [ ] All columns are imported as character strings, we have column class information from get_fields()
• [ ] We could convert some values to their R equivalent, for example: toestemming_gegevensgebruik == "on" might make more sense as toestemming_gegevensgebruik == TRUE, we could use date and time fields for datum_tijd_registratie and datum_observatie to save users on having to to these conversions themselves.
• [ ] List columns are still present in the output
• [ ] There are no elegant failure states for a request that goes wrong in any way
• [ ] The function takes a while to run, but has no progress reporting at all

Questions

• Howmany records are we expecting? I'm getting around 17994 at the moment. Is that in the right ballpark?
• We are expecting some values to me missing, some even most of the time. But I don't know what is expected to be mostly filled in and what is not. Does this look about right?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a8bVYH_SYoZklF8xKLRBixdFGvlfgGh-

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 16 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (56a0bb0) 0.00% compared to head (08622e8) 0.00%.

:exclamation: Current head 08622e8 differs from pull request most recent head 1479cb2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 1479cb2 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #12 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 0.00% 0.00% ===================================== Files 3 3 Lines 47 61 +14 ===================================== - Misses 47 61 +14 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/inbo/vespawatchr/pull/12?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inbo) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [R/get\_records.R](https://app.codecov.io/gh/inbo/vespawatchr/pull/12?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=inbo#diff-Ui9nZXRfcmVjb3Jkcy5S) | `0.00% <0.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[PietrH]

An issue remains where only one image url seems to be fetched for all records

[PietrH]

An issue remains where only one image url seems to be fetched for all records

False alarm, I was looking at foto_bestrijding which only has a value for a single record.

[PietrH]

@SanderDevisscher Is there any must have functionality missing from get_records(), or can we go ahead and merge into main and work on the other features independently?

Feel free to try it out on this branch with: get_records(access_token = get_access_token(username = "your_username"))

You'll need to install the package first, you can do this by hitting the Install button, under Build in RStudio. This should be visible if you load the project included in this repo. Let me know if you need any help! :wink:

[PietrH]

@SanderDevisscher Is there any must have functionality missing from get_records(), or can we go ahead and merge into main and work on the other features independently?

Feel free to try it out on this branch with: get_records(access_token = get_access_token(username = "your_username"))

You'll need to install the package first, you can do this by hitting the Install button, under Build in RStudio. This should be visible if you load the project included in this repo. Let me know if you need any help! :wink:

[SanderDevisscher]

Still in draft, should I wait ?

[PietrH]

Sorry, no go ahead