search

inbo / ipt-dcat

📃 Data Catalog Vocabulary (DCAT) functionality for the IPT
MIT License
4 stars 0 forks source link

Validator suggestions #44

Closed peterdesmet closed 9 years ago

peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

I just published a dataset and the resulting DCAT is valid :+1:. The validator does give some warnings/suggestions though:

screen shot 2015-07-29 at 13 05 37

I'll list them here. Some of those could be implemented, others might be valid but not be recognized by the validator.

Catalog

  1. Language: could be set to English
  2. Themes: we do have dcat:themeTaxonomy and skos:ConceptScheme, but that is apparently not recognized
  3. License: we have dct:rights, but should probably use dct:license?
  4. Homepage: should we add one?

    Dataset

  5. Language: an IPT resource has a metadata language property. Would be useful to use.
  6. Contact point: we have adms:contactPoint. Not sure why it is not recognized.
peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

A foaf:homepage for Catalog is actually mentioned in the mapping documentation.

peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

foaf:homepage described in separate issue: #48

simon-vc commented 9 years ago

Catalog

  1. I'll just put english
  2. This is an error in the validator
  3. I changed it to license, this makes more sense

Dataset

  1. I'll set the laguage
  2. This is fixed
peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

Great! I almost can't find any more questions/bugs/enhancements that I haven't reported already. :smile:

peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

Catalog

  1. Will you report the error to the DCAT validator team?

Dataset

  1. Make sure to take the metadata language (there is also a data language, but that doesn't apply here).
simon-vc commented 9 years ago

Reported and fixed the validator mistake

Do I need to use Eml#Language or Eml#MetaLanguage?

peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

Eml#MetaLanguage

simon-vc commented 9 years ago

All warnings are fixed

peterdesmet commented 9 years ago

Tested in v1.2: all warnings are now gone, except:

This issue can remain closed.

pietercolpaert commented 9 years ago

Did you open issues in the validator repo? If not, would you find the time to do so and reference them here?

Amenai commented 9 years ago

They are aware of it and we test it with the "local validator" and every thing is fine. No more warnings or errors

pietercolpaert commented 9 years ago

@Amenai what's the "local validator"?

Amenai commented 9 years ago

The not online version of the validator with all bug fixed. They will push it online in a second on EDIT : "dcat.be/validator"