Closed peterdesmet closed 2 months ago
My suggestion would be to keep that last sentence ("this animal tracking dataset is derived..."). While the DOI is retained, as displayed on the GBIF page it is in the context of "how to cite", rather than "check out the complete/original data source". Likewise, if you go to "How to cite", with the proposed change, users are directed to cite the data using the DOI but as accessed by GBIF, and not advised to consult the original source for more information.
Caveat is that I am representing a naive user here, and if this same situation is a typical case for lots of data types, and it is to be assumed that all GBIF representations involve a loss of context and information, maybe it is unnecessary. I do think the human readable link back to the full dataset/context would help make other movement ecologists comfortable sharing their data on GBIF.
Ok, so maybe the last paragraph can say:
Data have been standardized to Darwin Core using the movepub R package and are downsampled to the first GPS position per hour. The original data are available in Stienen et al. (2022, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6594838), a deposit of Movebank study 986040562.
Looks great!
See https://www.gbif.org/dataset/6c860eb3-83ba-48c3-9328-a7b3c7a3c7b4
[subsampled representation]
can be removed from the title. Camtrap DP to Darwin Core are also subsampled representations (animals only) and any transformation to Darwin Core will loose some information. I think it's better to keep the original title as is. Ping @timrobertson100I wonder if we even need to mention:
Since the DOI is kept the same.