Spp-117-nl

[Florian9041]

Description

spp-117-nl klaar voor review Hier is gerenderde pdf spp_117_nl_abiotiek_waterlopen.pdf

Related Issue

Task list

Steps by contributor:

• [x] Add description to this pull request (under "## Description")
• [x] Open the dropdown (triangle) near 'create pull request' and choose 'Create draft pull request'
• [x] Check for potential problems by running protocolhelper::check_frontmatter() and address them
• [x] Check for potential problems by running protocolhelper::check_structure() and address them
• [x] Add further commits if needed and push them to GitHub
• [x] Update the protocol-specific NEWS.Rmd
• [x] Mark the pull request as 'ready for review'

Review steps for the author(s):

• [x] Add reviewers, at least one subject-matter specialist and one administrator
• [x] Wait for review comments and address them
• [ ] Iterate until reviewer approvals (merging the pull request will be done by an administrator)
• [ ] Verify that the checks done by continuous integration succeeded. These will check if protocolhelper::check_frontmatter() and protocolhelper::check_structure() succeeded without errors.

To be done by an administrator after review: see guidelines for admins.

[hansvancalster]

@karenwuyts hier is nog een protocol van het MNM project. De gerenderde versie: spp_117_nl_abiotiek_waterlopen.zip

Het is klaar om gereviewed te worden.

[Florian9041]

Small suggested changes in 02, 04, 05 and 06. In addition, the title could be more in analogy with spp-116-nl: ‘Abiotische staalname in stromende oppervlaktewateren’; given that this is a project-specific protocol, should the project name be mentioned in the title?

@anleyssen Wat denk jij?

[anleyssen]

Ik heb de opmerkingen van Karen bekeken en per item antwoorden gegeven of suggesties voorgesteld. De voorgestelde tekstuele aanpassingen van Karen lijken me allemaal ok.