search

inbo / riparias-prep

Preparatory scripts and data management for the RIPARIAS workflow
MIT License
0 stars 1 forks source link

32 baseline check #36

Closed SanderDevisscher closed 2 years ago

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

Fixes #32 Data from VMM was missing due to a error in the easin flow fixed in PR #48. The same PR also contains a rerun of all the scripts.

Additionally a new baseline export has been added to the maps_prep script. This geojson contains all observations up to 2020-12-31 within the riparias perimeter.

adrienlatli commented 2 years ago

@SanderDevisscher : hi Sander. Thank you for your update. I can't download a csv version of the final baseline (I am unable to turn the txt file into a workable csv). Can you send it to me ? thank you so much

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

@adrienlatli I've added a standard .csv export of the baseline data.

Can you try opening this file ? baseline_data.csv

adrienlatli commented 2 years ago

@SanderDevisscher Hello, I have checked the new baseline. This time, all is going well for Flanders but for Wallonia many points have disappeared (640; orgin SPW-DEMNA database). It's quite strange because in the baseline of July all the Walloon points were present ...

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

@adrienlatli are the points also missing if you ignore the source ?

adrienlatli commented 2 years ago

@SanderDevisscher Not sure to well understanding your question. I downloaded the current csv and i Have only 5736 observations versus 6376 for the csv made in jully (without 2021 points). The data owners of the miising points is the SPW-DEMN

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

Ok I'll look into it

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

the website has been updated.

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

@adrienlatli I did some enhancements concerning the occurence status of the observations to allow future logging of absences (none yet, vmm data is displayed currently as NA). Can you look at the app to see if no errors have occurred. ifnot you can approve this PR.

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

@adrienlatli I assume you wanted to approve this PR? correct ?

adrienlatli commented 2 years ago

Yes, but I have only few experience with Github sorry if I made a mistake

SanderDevisscher commented 2 years ago

Yes, but I have only few experience with Github sorry if I made a mistake

No problem