Closed SanderDevisscher closed 3 years ago
OK, I played around a bit with those. My proposal for criterium:
n_totaal
): >=100 ANDThis should leave the following number of species:
species | Classification | n_totaal | % |
---|---|---|---|
Astacopsis gouldi | Cfb | 713 | 99 |
Austropotamobius pallipes | Cfb | 8222 | 94 |
Austropotamobius torrentium | Dfb | 410 | 96 |
Cambarus robustus | Dfb | 355 | 54 |
Cherax destructor | Cfb | 1410 | 43 |
Creaserinus fodiens | Dfb | 147 | 16 |
Engaeus granulatus | Cfb | 140 | 14 |
Euastacus armatus | Cfb | 396 | 47 |
Euastacus kershawi | Cfb | 219 | 99 |
Euastacus spinifer | Cfb | 190 | 53 |
Euastacus sulcatus | Cfb | 118 | 25 |
Euastacus yarraensis | Cfb | 173 | 94 |
Faxonius immunis | Dfb | 154 | 53 |
Faxonius propinquus | Dfb | 344 | 62 |
Faxonius rusticus | Dfb | 169 | 17 |
Faxonius virilis | Dfb | 615 | 39 |
Paranephrops planifrons | Cfb | 263 | 100 |
Spinastacoides inermis | Cfb | 192 | 93 |
species | Classification | n_totaal | % |
---|---|---|---|
Astacopsis gouldi | Cfb | 713 | 81 |
Austropotamobius torrentium | Cfa | 410 | 91 |
Cambaroides similis | Cfa | 156 | 19 |
Cambarus acuminatus | Cfa | 211 | 100 |
Cambarus hobbsorum | Cfa | 317 | 100 |
Cambarus latimanus | Cfa | 929 | 100 |
Cambarus longulus | Cfa | 147 | 100 |
Cambarus robustus | Cfa | 355 | 83 |
Cambarus striatus | Cfa | 487 | 100 |
Cambarus tenebrosus | Cfa | 158 | 100 |
Cherax destructor | Cfa | 1410 | 33 |
Creaserinus fodiens | Cfa | 147 | 91 |
Euastacus armatus | Cfa | 396 | 51 |
Euastacus kershawi | Cfa | 219 | 45 |
Euastacus spinifer | Cfa | 190 | 95 |
Euastacus sulcatus | Cfa | 118 | 98 |
Euastacus yarraensis | Cfb | 173 | 35 |
Faxonius immunis | Cfa | 154 | 66 |
Faxonius propinquus | Cfa | 344 | 39 |
Faxonius rusticus | Cfa | 169 | 67 |
Faxonius virilis | Cfa | 615 | 29 |
Lacunicambarus diogenes | Cfa | 332 | 94 |
Paranephrops planifrons | Cfa | 263 | 21 |
Procambarus gracilis | Cfa | 110 | 57 |
Procambarus spiculifer | Cfa | 291 | 100 |
Procambarus versutus | Cfa | 175 | 100 |
Spinastacoides inermis | Cfb | 192 | 100 |
species | n_totaal | current | future |
---|---|---|---|
Astacopsis gouldi | 713 | Cfb | Cfb |
Austropotamobius torrentium | 410 | Dfb | Cfa |
Cambarus robustus | 355 | Dfb | Cfa |
Cherax destructor | 1410 | Cfb | Cfa |
Creaserinus fodiens | 147 | Dfb | Cfa |
Euastacus armatus | 396 | Cfb | Cfa |
Euastacus kershawi | 219 | Cfb | Cfa |
Euastacus spinifer | 190 | Cfb | Cfa |
Euastacus sulcatus | 118 | Cfb | Cfa |
Euastacus yarraensis | 173 | Cfb | Cfb |
Faxonius immunis | 154 | Dfb | Cfa |
Faxonius propinquus | 344 | Dfb | Cfa |
Faxonius rusticus | 169 | Dfb | Cfa |
Faxonius virilis | 615 | Dfb | Cfa |
Paranephrops planifrons | 263 | Cfb | Cfa |
Spinastacoides inermis | 192 | Cfb | Cfb |
I find it striking though that none of the species occur twice in both climate classifications for Belgium.
If we are a bit more severe on the criteria:
=150 records, 20% overlap
current: 14 future: 22 both: 13 species
=200 records, 20% overlap
current: 10 future: 15 both: 9 species
@adrienlatli can you take a look at the above list and tell us if that is workable? Do we want to land at around 30 spp to risk assess or do we go for less?
Great Job Sander thx.
I think 30 spp to risk assess is realizable by Romain. This number could be improve if they find new species in shop but I'm think it's still feasible. I need to present these results to Romain and Etienne and I will come back soon.
@timadriaens : If you can add Romain to Github it's must be usefull :-) (WILLEPUT Romain Romain.Willeput@ulb.be)
ok! we need his github name for that
@adrienlatli OK, calculating back from those 30 species I propose the following cut-offs (it appears the total number of records on gbif is more limiting than the degree of KG overlap):
n_totaal
>= 90perc_climate
>= 0.20This leaves exactly 30 species.
Astacopsis franklinii Astacopsis gouldi Austropotamobius torrentium Cambarus acuminatus Cambarus bartonii Cambarus hobbsorum Cambarus latimanus Cambarus longirostris Cambarus longulus Cambarus robustus Cambarus striatus Cambarus tenebrosus Cherax destructor Creaserinus fodiens Euastacus armatus Euastacus kershawi Euastacus spinifer Euastacus sulcatus Euastacus yarraensis Faxonius immunis Faxonius palmeri Faxonius propinquus Faxonius rusticus Faxonius virilis Lacunicambarus diogenes Paranephrops planifrons Procambarus gracilis Procambarus spiculifer Procambarus versutus Spinastacoides inermis
@SanderDevisscher can you rerun using those selection criteria?
ok! we need his github name for that
@adrienlatli can you provide his github username ?
In the current climate matching outputs (see future & present - data overlays) contain all species with at least 1 record in the belgian climate zones (Cfa, Cfb & Dfb). A single/low number of record(s) can be an error, fluke, etc.... and can best be excluded from the list.
But a what number do we place the threshold ?