[acf] Ambrosia

[daprela]

I will add the new template shortly

[daprela]

I've just added the Ambrosia template. I think you'll love this, I've used all the techniques developed in the previous templates plus a couple new, and the result is an extremely flexible template.

I've run out of landing pages templates. @DavidWells if you don't give me some new templates to work on, starting from tomorrow I'll go back working on the email templates, unless you ask me to do something else.

[atwellpub]

Going to start setting one up now.

[atwellpub]

Hey I've started building this one up. It builds very smooth. These repeaters are awesome.

Two things I wonder, and I can't tell cause I have not seen the original:

• is there going to be a header
• should this one have a conversion area for inbound form? I am not seeing one.

[daprela]

No, there isn't any header here. As for the conversion area, I've called it subscribe section, and it's a flexible field area. In fact, I should have called it conversion area, I'll change the name

[atwellpub]

Subscribe v conversion area. I like subscribe too. Only reason to go with conversion area is for standardization sake.

[atwellpub]

Looking over the conversion area at the moment and have some questions and maybe suggestions: http://screencast.com/t/90JCJM3hzNEi

[daprela]

I tried to make the forms 100% when I first started styling them, and I wasn't really satisfied about it just because the wysiwyg editor allows you total freedom of adding content, and you never know what a user wants to do with it. It is a possible solution though, there is just one line of css to make it work correctly without messing up the form. Add this at the end of the style section in the template head, if it makes sense I will make the commit.

#inbound-form-wrapper input:not(.checkbox-inbound-vertical) { width: 100%; }

[daprela]

I've added the style for you. I've just realized that the css in this form is pretty complex because it's generated dynamically, don't want you to lose time to just understand how it works. I think that the styling with 100% width is much better looking than before. The user has also the opportunity to change label colors, fields bg colors and button color. I think that this is all he needs to have. What do you think?

[atwellpub]

I think full width looks great.

The only other addition would be to control the %width of the form container. Or leave it to custom CSS, what do you think?

[daprela]

Do you want to add an option to the user to control the width of the form? That would be confusing for non technical users. I'm sure that to many of them 100% would refer to the width of the screen, not the width of an obscure and invisible box at the center of the screen. We would be flooded by support tickets if we would add this option for inbound forms. I think it's better to leave it to custom CSS

[atwellpub]

Ok sounds good. Template rocks.