Suggests specification of return type of setters (#meth=)

[paddor]

The return value of those kinds of method is enforced by ruby to be exactly the object given as parameter. Maybe you could deduce it from the parameter's documentation or just stop suggesting this on setter methods.

[rrrene]

Good catch! I will try to update Inch over the holidays :+1:

[paddor]

Thank you. :-) Enjoy the holidays!

[paddor]

Any news on this?

Also, it seems like refreshing doesn't work anymore...

[rrrene]

Hi, I'm on it. Server clogged up somehow. :scream:

Had a nasty cold over the holidays and then ... forgot. Sorry. :sweat:

[paddor]

Oh no, very sorry to hear that.

Take your time. :-)

[paddor]

Thanks a lot! :+1:

[rrrene]

Hey, this is not live yet. I am re-opening the issue to not forget it.

(I have to make a new release of Inch and point Inch CI to it. Won't get that done today, unfortunately.)

[paddor]

Oops :sweat_smile: All I did was test is the Refresh button and verify whether Inch CI suggests setting a @return on setter methods. And it doesn't, which I like. So what else is there to come?

[paddor]

Any updates?

[rrrene]

Not sure, I am a bit out of the loop on my Github Issues as there is currently soooo much work. :scream:

Does Inch CI now behave the way you suggested?

[paddor]

I just checked! Yes, it does. No more suggestions for return type on #foo= methods. Thank you!