search

indice-co / EDI.Net

EDI Serializer/Deserializer. Supports EDIFact, X12 and TRADACOMS formats
MIT License
450 stars 170 forks source link

[discussion] Comparing with ediFabric #58

Open hellboy81 opened 7 years ago

hellboy81 commented 7 years ago

I am looking fo some comparisons/benchmarks comparing this library with EdiFabric

cleftheris commented 7 years ago

I have not taken the time to do such a benchmark. I guess it depends on the scenario. I would like to put something together with BenchmarkDotNet but no actual plan. I am open to contribution though.

hellboy81 commented 7 years ago

I mean I am new with EDIFACT format and I don't know which library can be/should be used for exporting only cases

cleftheris commented 7 years ago

It depends on your scenario. Both libraries are capable of producing EDIFACT.

michaelachrisco commented 6 years ago

I have used both for sample files. I would say that both libraries are just about as fast as one another. One big difference is EDI.Net is open source (MIT) where EdiFabric is mostly proprietary (Examples are AGPL). The full version of EdiFabric comes with sample classes like: EF_HIPAA_005010X222A1_837 I also like how EDI.Net has pretty good test coverage. Both are excellent libraries to build out EDI files.