Closed sidmani closed 6 years ago
I would leave both options. Because the idea is to be able to use both HAML and Markdown within one markup language, and not to invent a new flavor of Markdown.
I personally would use ##
notation for a static content, and HAML syntax %h2
for parts being generated with Ruby.
I see. I might write a language of my own then 😁
I think the critical thing is to make HTML classes and tags more accessible in markdown; integrating variables and things like that seems to be more in the scope of a templating language.
According to the spec, a level-2 header could be either:
## Header
or
Syntax duplication is a generally confusing for the end-user, so I think something like
##.f2.helvetica
could work better. Thoughts?I'm interested in this because I maintain Anodize, which is a static site generator that currently uses markdown + YAML + liquid templates, and a better language could be useful.