Closed SergkeiM closed 7 months ago
@jessarcher @reinink When do we think this could be looked at and potentially merged? I need this issue resolved asap and if this does indeed resolve the issue without any problems then I am +1 on getting this merge asap.
Hey! Thanks for this suggestion, but I think we're going to stick with qs
for now because this is just too risky of a change as there could be unexpected side effects for not a lot of gain. Might revisit this in the future, but for now going to leave it as is 👍
Hi @reinink as mentioned #1791 here we can release a beta or pre-release for people to test.
I would actually replace both libraries with just UrlSearchParams
For my case the size was very important, so I unded up creating a custom build, I've also replaced axios
with alova.js is a fetch
based lightweight request strategy library that supports upload progress.
Hey @reinink
To add to this, you say its not a lot of gain but there is a clear issue with the package being not optimised/needs improving its size.
I have opened a issue regarding this here - https://github.com/inertiajs/inertia/issues/1804
Google simply don't like the package size and is a factor in its rating on your site which affects performance and seo being that if the score in lower than it should be.
Hi @reinink
The purpose of this PR is to reduce the size of
@inertiajs/core
.Starting from version
qs@6.10.0
increased size by 60%If we check the size of @inertiajs/core
12% - belongs to
qs
(9.8kB min + gzip - 31.3kB min)I believe this is a lot for simple helper to build
URL query
.In this PR:
qs
is replaced by query-string (2.5kB min + gzip) x4 smaller thenqs
, but does the same thing.