Closed pulsipher closed 7 months ago
Attention: 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
ad13a33
) 99.76% compared to head (f78eabe
) 99.74%.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/macros.jl | 98.79% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The 1.6 failure is our fault, because we don't have <0.0.1
here: https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/blob/5b1a53f0a5adb7028ec2356f6239657a21475891/Project.toml#L24
The 1.6 failure is our fault, because we don't have
<0.0.1
here: https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/blob/5b1a53f0a5adb7028ec2356f6239657a21475891/Project.toml#L24
Ok, I'll wait for the fix then.
Ok, I'll wait for the fix then.
It's just because you're using Pkg
in the tests. This is a bug in Julia 1.6. When we tag a release of JuMP it'll work.
Edit: I guess it doesn't hurt: https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/pull/3626
Hopefully fixed, so try re-running the tests.
Hopefully fixed, so try re-running the tests.
That seems to have fixed it, thanks!
This tries out https://github.com/jump-dev/JuMP.jl/pull/3620 as a proof of concept.
cc @odow