Open skellock opened 9 years ago
I've had a similar thought, and came up with this: What about the idea of eventually supporting sections in Android? It's not a native concept, but the support would be there so copypasta projects would behave the same. There would be a lot of mechanics going on under the covers, but ACTUALLY, there's a lot of mechanics going on in iOS to do this anyhow! I guess what I"m saying is, we're supporting an API, so I think we'll have to wrap the concept on both sides nomatter what we settle.
how do I spend this $0.02 cents Canadian? The drink machine isn't fooled at all.
Agreed. This is a polishing detail we can work out later.
I think a bit of my angst stems from the iOS platform too. Even if my TableScreen
doesn't have sections
, I still must define them in table_data
. Seems like RP and BP could both figure out my intentions in this scenario.
The question then becomes: would supporting this shortcut cripple future growth of the table_data
api?
Yes.
Closing.
But I'll get you next time gadget. next time......
I actually agree with your angst here. Re-opening for future discussion.
class MyScreen < PM::TableScreen
def table_data
{
sections: [{
title: "My section",
cells: [{ ... }]
}]
}
end
end
class MyScreen < PM::TableScreen
def table_data
{
cells: [{ ... }]
}
end
end
I like the idea of creating a PM::ListScreen
subclass that doesn't allow section headers, and changing both the RedPotion and BluePotion versions to list_data
rather than table_data
.
class MyScreen < PM::ListScreen
def list_data
[
{ ... cell ... },
]
end
end
This is just for discussion.
On iOS, the return value for
table_data
is an[]
of sections. Each containing{cells:[]}
to get to the goods. Make sense.On Android, we have the same interface, but we don't have sections over here, so I feel like the interface isn't quite right.
Our current implementation says
[]
->PMBaseAdapter
and{adapter: ...}
->PMCursorAdapter
.It'd be super cool if
{cells: []}
could invoke the base adapter too.I'm creating a lot of
[{cells: cells}]
return values from mytable_data
screens. It'd be nice if it were just{cells: cells}
or even just[{cell 1},{cell2}]
.Just wanted to throw it out there because sections won't be a native thing on Android.
Holy crap this is so not a big deal. I'm cool with a
wontfix
label of shame. Just my $0.02 (Canadian).