Based on #27, I've created a proposed solution without breaking backward compatibility for new input types.
Currently, there are only two types;
text
boolean
Which can be improved based on the changes @manuelvrhovac created in the PR mentioned. Also, additionally I added support for custom validators (two for now), which are type dependent and can be easily used on the item level.
@manuelvrhovac I would suggest checking this implementation (as this is an example of how we can simplify things), but with a new feature and idea you proposed. Let me know what you think.
Based on #27, I've created a proposed solution without breaking backward compatibility for new input types.
Currently, there are only two types;
textbooleanWhich can be improved based on the changes @manuelvrhovac created in the PR mentioned. Also, additionally I added support for custom validators (two for now), which are type dependent and can be easily used on the item level.
@manuelvrhovac I would suggest checking this implementation (as this is an example of how we can simplify things), but with a new feature and idea you proposed. Let me know what you think.
Note This is still WIP and should be discussed.