Closed songzhilai closed 3 months ago
Hi @songzhilai,
to clarify: Do you mean you achieved the above-written result using the default parameters for inch
and using the same data sin your test with this library?
This issue has been closed because it has not had recent activity. Please reopen if this issue is still important to you and you have additionally information.
Proposal: True support for concurrent writing.
Current behavior: The test result using inch tool is:70w pt/sec But using client can only reach 15w
Desired behavior: Concurrent writing can be configured through parameters.
Use case: