Closed zak-pawel closed 1 month ago
A valuable rule, but after a quick review of the findings, it seems that there might be a lot of false positives (more info: here).
While I would love to get a check on those, the number of false-positives worries me! I'd say we revisit this checker in a few versions and see if they honor bound checks... What do you think?
@srebhan Makes perfect sense
Should we close the issue then as "not planned" and you keep it on your list @zak-pawel?
Let's do as you suggest.
Use Case
This issue starts discussion about enabling:
Rule is mapped to CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound.
Expected behavior
Decision if rule should be enabled or not.
Actual behavior
For this rule following findings were found in current code:
Additional info
For this rule no additional configuration can be provided.