Closed abynenkov-ib closed 4 years ago
yes, please change it - i have changed the desc in the issue
we'll support !~ in a different issue if needed.
isn't !~ the same as not re_match(...)
? if so where not subject.jti =~ "@petstore.com$"
should suffice, right?
Done, but ~=
seems better to me
And I agree with Phil, !~
(not match) is not needed, because it's possible to use not
operator in seal
Alexey you're gonna hate this, but I realized I recalled the wrong token for regexp operator in perl: it's
=~
(and!~
), not~=
. If it's possible I think we should change to=~
as that's what most people are used to. @wplu should we also support!~
for negated regexp matching?