Closed ddooley closed 2 years ago
I'd like to check with @alanruttenberg since he is the term editor of 'mentions'.
Hi @alanruttenberg, How do you think to add "mentioned by" as an inverse object property of "mentions"? Thanks!
Fine by me. Not much difference in the naming but "mentioned by" slightly preferred.
The term was added.
Due to our use of robot tables to associate instances with the data specifications they are associated with, it would be handy to have "mentioned by" as an inverse object property of "mentions". (We're dealing with enumerations where the enumeration has to stay looser about the kinds of things it references, so unable to use 'member of').
Is "mentioned by" better than "mentioned in"? Technically X 'mentioned in' Y may convey the nuance that a component or part of Y is doing the denotation (the mentioning).
Shall I make a pull request for that?