search

information-artifact-ontology / IAO

information artifact ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
78 stars 25 forks source link

move 'is about' to RO #264

Open wdduncan opened 1 year ago

wdduncan commented 1 year ago

The RO has gotten requests for relations that may make use of the is about relation (e.g., https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/issues/535). To handle, this I have made a PR to import is about from IAO (see https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/pull/655).

The suggestion was made by @jamesaoverton to move is about to RO. So, I'm soliciting your opinions.

alanruttenberg commented 1 year ago

I do not support this change.

wdduncan commented 1 year ago

Thanks @alanruttenberg !

zhengj2007 commented 1 year ago

If OBO decided to use RO as the home of all relations, I am OK to move 'is about' to the RO. But we'd keep the IRI of the term since it has been widely used.

hoganwr commented 1 year ago

I don't see why import isn't sufficient. I am with Alan.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:01 PM jie zheng @.***> wrote:

If OBO decided to use RO as the home of all relations, I am OK to move 'is about' to the RO. But we'd keep the IRI of the term since it has been widely used.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/IAO/issues/264#issuecomment-1335771959, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJR55QDVZZ4EUG2ENHDFSTWLJIRFANCNFSM6AAAAAASO4SDOY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>