Open matentzn opened 4 years ago
The other alternative is to use properties like omo:layPersonDefinition
and just create annotation properties for the cases we care about.
The latter seems a little more straightforward; if I understand the former the synonym Type would an annotation property over iao: alternativeTerm?
I'm interested in a lay person description for DUO as well, happy to follow general guidance. We will probably need multi language support (ie layperson definition in English, Japanese, French...) So using rich annotations seems a bit heavy?
Agree strongly with Melanie. Use a different property. Even dc:description
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:56 PM Melanie Courtot notifications@github.com wrote:
The latter seems a little more straightforward; if I understand the former the synonym Type would an annotation property over iao: alternativeTerm?
I'm interested in a lay person description for DUO as well, happy to follow general guidance. We will probably need multi language support (ie layperson definition in English, Japanese, French...) So using rich annotations seems a bit heavy?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/56#issuecomment-713838311, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOP2H6XVHJIYDXX5SFDSL44ITANCNFSM4S2GBYAA .
Some ontologies use
oio:synonymType
to say things like:oio:synonymType xx:Layperson
. We have been discussing recently with @mellybelly, @nicolevasilevsky and @JadeHotchkiss on how to generalise this for definitions, or in fact any kind of lexical information (perhaps even comments). So basically the question is: can, and should, we generalise thesynonymType
modelling pattern for these cases?Who else is interested in discussing this more? Who has worked "layperson" definitions?