Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Made change in version 2.2
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 23 May 2013 at 6:57
John,
There are some pretty substantial differences between how controls are
described in the CBECC tool and how they are described in the ACM. I think the
intent of what controls are supported in CBECC are more or less in-line with
the ACM, but I think it is worth having a call/demo to describe how these have
been implemented, and review if these changes require ACM updates.
Let me know if you are interested in a demo/call to discuss and I'll set up a
Doodle poll.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 24 Sep 2013 at 7:09
John will make ACM updates to reflect current approach:
AirSys = SZACVAV
2spd cooling coil
VSD fan with min 0.5 flow ratio
Furnace heating
Warmest zone reset between 55 and 95F
DR: Need to confirm reset priority method (flow or temp first)
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 7 Nov 2013 at 7:16
Made updates to ACM (v3 release, expected late November).
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 19 Nov 2013 at 11:34
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 19 Nov 2013 at 11:34
David, see the attached revisions to section 5.7.5.2. I think the ACM intent is
carried out in CBECC, as you mention, so if this language needs further
tweaking, maybe we can have a brief call this Friday 11/22, or early next week,
so we can close this one out.
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 21 Nov 2013 at 11:49
Attachments:
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 21 Nov 2013 at 11:50
John,
I am confused, the SZVAV revisions now only have a Standard Design rule for
supply fan low speed limits, no rules for capacity fractions or other
properties of baseline SZVAV systems.
Also, how do the following descriptors play into the CBECC compliance analysis:
Duct Leakage Rate
Airflow Adjustment Factor
Refrigerant Charge Factor
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 25 Nov 2013 at 10:23
David, please review the attached language for single-zone VAV related building
descriptors and verify that this is consistent with our implementation. I
removed the airflow adjustment factor and refrigerant charge factor.
I also removed the custom curve fit language for the SEER/EER equipment below
65 kBtu/h.
Original comment by JohnJArent
on 3 Dec 2013 at 9:00
Attachments:
John,
The only discrepency is that The low speed SZVAV fan power is governed by the
fan curve and the min flow, which is set to Max(0.5*Fan Capacity, Required Vent
Rate). I think this is a trivial difference, so closing issue. Let me know if
you have any questions on the implementation.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 15 Feb 2014 at 7:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
da...@360-analytics.com
on 2 May 2013 at 8:14