Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Thanks for the heads up Diane.
Here is are some specific related item I just ran across:
FluidSystem:Type
- Revise ChilledWaterSystem to ChilledWater
CoilHeating:FuelSource
- Revise HotWaterSys to HotWater
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 24 Aug 2012 at 9:24
[deleted comment]
About CoilHeating:FuelSource: The Heating Source list in the NR ACM section
5.7.6 is the authority (I think) for this property, and it combines fuels and
sources of a heating medium and some of the values e.g. Steam and Hot Water do
not indicate the fuel used. I'd like to change the property to be called
HeatingSource. If we need to define the fuel used like electric, gas or oil we
can have a FuelSource term also defined.
I won't change the property name until I hear from others if that makes sense.
The SDD terms are now FluidSystem:Type ChilledWater and CoilHeating:FuelSource
HotWater. The value in the SharePoint list Term column, however has to be
decorated with a suffix because these enumerations are used multiple times and
the suffix distinguishes each one so they can be assigned to a property
correctly in the Properties list. The SDD term column has the term as it
should be used, without the suffix. I'm in the process of assigning suffixes
more consistently which should help.
Original comment by di...@lmonte.com
on 27 Aug 2012 at 6:35
Regarding CoilHeating:FuelSource...
As currently structured, there are two coil properties that define the coils
principal characteristics:
Type
FuelSource
The combination of the two are intended to define all the types covered by the
NACM. Admittedly, there can be some redundancy with this method. For example,
Type=ElectricResistance and FuelSource=Electric. This redundancy could be
eliminated by removing ElectricResistance, which would instead be defined as
Type=Furnace, and FuelSource=Electric.
For coils that do not directly use fuel, such as Type=HotWater, Steam, the
FuelSource property would not be specified or would be ignored.
I am fine with consolidating these definitions of the coil to one property,
however, would suggest listing out the enumerations here for review before
making this change. Also, suggest outlining the same new property for
CoilCooling, since currently it uses the same convention.
Regarding the second point, I am having a hard time following what the issue
is, and sounds like it is more of an SP organizational issue than a SDD
structure issue. If you need input from me on this, I suggest a quick phone
call. Thx
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 27 Aug 2012 at 5:11
As far as I can tell the values for fuel source are correct for CoilCooling and
CoilHeating.
Original comment by di...@lmonte.com
on 10 Jan 2013 at 8:13
We have this issue straightened out.
Original comment by rhedr...@archenergy.com
on 15 Oct 2013 at 3:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
di...@lmonte.com
on 24 Aug 2012 at 7:32