Open wchristian opened 9 years ago
Is there a reason, other than historical, to call the method subsumes instead of contains? @dagolden
Contains could sound like it relates to contents. I've never been fond of the name subsumes, either, so I have little advice to give, either. On Dec 13, 2014 12:04 PM, "fREW Schmidt" notifications@github.com wrote:
Is there a reason, other than historical, to call the method subsumes instead of contains? @dagolden https://github.com/dagolden
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ingydotnet/io-all-pm/issues/64#issuecomment-66883037.
If you implement subsumes, you probably also want realpath and you should look at what Path::Tiny does to avoid various Cwd issues for that, too.
Another thing from Path::Tiny, which is actually really useful to have when you need it:
https://metacpan.org/pod/Path::Tiny#subsumes