Open inhies opened 11 years ago
I think more important than splitting it into utilities would be logically splitting it into subcommands the way git
or hg
do it.
Yeah, the way git and hg do it is great. Splitting it off into shit would just get confusing.
Cjdcmd is big and getting bigger. Some users have requested that cjdcmd be split in to single function utilities, like the traditional Linux ping and traceroute programs.
This is possible, however naming becomes an issue. We can't just name these utilities 'ping' and such because those already exist. Does anyone have some ideas for a pre or post-fix that can be added to the functions to distinguish them as belonging to cjdcmd?
Keep in mind the proposed name change to core or cor3 as in issue #2