Closed OleMartinChristensen closed 1 year ago
if it looks ok now can you approve @skymandr ?
I cannot get this to work with l1b data..?
I cannot get this to work with l1b data..?
At a guess this is because the L1B-data in all current versions have a residual prefix in the form of the L1A-bucket from which it originates. This needs to be put in the path (or alternatively the prefix-attribute where applicable) explicitly. See the coverage script that I sent you for an example. Note that this prefix will be removed in future versions.
I cannot get this to work with l1b data..?
At a guess this is because the L1B-data in all current versions have a residual prefix in the form of the L1A-bucket from which it originates. This needs to be put in the path (or alternatively the prefix-attribute where applicable) explicitly. See the coverage script that I sent you for an example. Note that this prefix will be removed in future versions.
yes ill do a patch for this before we merge
I cannot get this to work with l1b data..?
At a guess this is because the L1B-data in all current versions have a residual prefix in the form of the L1A-bucket from which it originates. This needs to be put in the path (or alternatively the prefix-attribute where applicable) explicitly. See the coverage script that I sent you for an example. Note that this prefix will be removed in future versions.
yes ill do a patch for this before we merge
I think that functionality might be better to have in Mats-utils than in this function to be fair.
I cannot get this to work with l1b data..?
At a guess this is because the L1B-data in all current versions have a residual prefix in the form of the L1A-bucket from which it originates. This needs to be put in the path (or alternatively the prefix-attribute where applicable) explicitly. See the coverage script that I sent you for an example. Note that this prefix will be removed in future versions.
yes ill do a patch for this before we merge
I think that functionality might be better to have in Mats-utils than in this function to be fair.
yes, agreed. I will add it there, just want to test it before mergning in this ;)
Improves performance for slow internet connections. See issue #138