Certain ideas display nothing when clicked

[camerontt2000]

Certain ideas display nothing now when clicked, e.g. "aims of interpretation" https://inpho.cogs.indiana.edu/idea/2061

This is unacceptable. We need to display something for each idea.

[colinallen]

I think this "idea" should be deleted. Where did it come from?

[camerontt2000]

I am not sure where it came from, but it's still worrisome that it did not even display SEP internal or Noesis search results like other ideas. We need to figure out why so we can prevent this happening for other ideas, whether good or bad entries in our dictionary.

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:26 AM, colinallen notifications@github.comwrote:

I think this "idea" should be deleted. Where did it come from?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/inpho/inphosite/issues/90#issuecomment-10372553.

Cameron Buckner University of Houston Department of Philosophy 713.743.2255

Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellow Institut für Philosophie II Ruhr-Universität, Bochum

http://cameronbuckner.net/professional/

[colinallen]

The reason there are no results is that the search pattern has no
hits. The search engine results are connected to joint searches and
do not show up until you click a search (magnifying glass) link. We
should have a special way to handle entities that have no
statistically detected associates.

I am not sure where it came from, but it's still worrisome that it
did not even display SEP internal or Noesis search results like other ideas.
We need to figure out why so we can prevent this happening for other
ideas, whether good or bad entries in our dictionary.

[camerontt2000]

What about searching for individual components of a complex ngram if the whole has no hits, and just a "no hits" message if still no results?

Cameron Buckner (Sent from my Android) On Nov 14, 2012 4:15 PM, "colinallen" notifications@github.com wrote:

The reason there are no results is that the search pattern has no hits. The search engine results are connected to joint searches and do not show up until you click a search (magnifying glass) link. We should have a special way to handle entities that have no statistically detected associates.

I am not sure where it came from, but it's still worrisome that it did not even display SEP internal or Noesis search results like other ideas. We need to figure out why so we can prevent this happening for other ideas, whether good or bad entries in our dictionary.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/inpho/inphosite/issues/90#issuecomment-10388238.

[JaimieMurdock]

I'll task Alex with making a data integrity check for no stats. On Nov 14, 2012 6:32 PM, "camerontt2000" notifications@github.com wrote:

What about searching for individual components of a complex ngram if the whole has no hits, and just a "no hits" message if still no results?

Cameron Buckner (Sent from my Android) On Nov 14, 2012 4:15 PM, "colinallen" notifications@github.com wrote:

The reason there are no results is that the search pattern has no hits. The search engine results are connected to joint searches and do not show up until you click a search (magnifying glass) link. We should have a special way to handle entities that have no statistically detected associates.

I am not sure where it came from, but it's still worrisome that it did not even display SEP internal or Noesis search results like other ideas. We need to figure out why so we can prevent this happening for other ideas, whether good or bad entries in our dictionary.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/inpho/inphosite/issues/90#issuecomment-10388238>.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/inpho/inphosite/issues/90#issuecomment-10390937.

[JaimieMurdock]

Created the warning text on the redesign. Example: https://inpho.cogs.indiana.edu/idea/2050