Closed jonathancross closed 6 years ago
Friendly ping @jonnysmillie
Hi @jonathancross, thanks for your contribution. Unfortunately I cannot approve content changes to this documentation. You should seek a review from @denisshevchenko.
Thanks @jonnysmillie , would still appreciate a review from you. @denisshevchenko : any issues here? Or perhaps @jonnysmillie , @KtorZ or @h0rhay can help out?
@denisshevchenko is indeed working on improving this doc (from cardano-sl though) if I recall correctly. Might be nice for you two to sync!
Thanks!
Thanks @KtorZ , unfortunatly it looks like @denisshevchenko might be on vacation or something. I see that @edsko recently reviewed his documentation PR, maybe he can help out here?
I don't have github privileges to formally review this, but these seem to be stylistic corrections only, looks fine to me.
Thanks @edsko -- anyone can review a PR, even if you cannot merge. Having an approval helps others establish merge-worthiness (regardless of your status within this particular project).
Ah, quite. I thought I couldn't as I could add myself as a reviewer :)
Thanks for merging @KtorZ. I'd consider contributing more, but probably not if simple PRs take 5 months for approval. Are further contributions welcome?
@jonathancross My apologizes for the delay, I hadn't write access on the repo until recently so couldn't really do anything. I do now.
Contributions are highly welcome :) Thanks again!
I did my best here (based on my understanding of Bitcoin HD wallets), but there were some sentences which didn't make sense to me. Feel free to suggest corrections or we can wait and do a follow up PR with more improvements.
In the future, we might want to consider using terms more uniformly from BIP-32 and removing parts of this which just repeat portions of that spec so it is clear what is unique about Cardano.