Closed zmeel closed 4 years ago
I know this a probably a duplicate but there seems to be no response to these similar issues of what the community is calling a 'vaporized block'. I would really like to know (and probably other pool owners too) if this is normal behaviour or a bug. If this is normal how could we improve? This is killing my pool performance and reputation.
So please could you respond and explain this block creation behaviour?
I have INFO level log files of both nodes.
47.38883#146726 - Vaporized? on v0.8.7 after 0.8.9 released.
{"msg":"Leader event started","level":"INFO","ts":"2020-01-30T08:49:43.000390700-08:00","event_remaining_time":"1s 999ms 609us 300ns","event_end":"2020-01-30T16:49:45+00:00","event_start":"2020-01-30T16:49:43+00:00","event_date":"47.38883","leader_id":"1","task":"leadership"}
{"msg":"receiving block from leadership service","level":"INFO","ts":"2020-01-30T08:49:43.001387800-08:00","date":"47.38883","parent":"b383538acac5df48c8d4a5789c37b1fd215ee3871fe4ae108d0fbdf3ee5fa51d","hash":"978fb9a6312f178273d929bd3628aa6168e21a9f11e5bbf56bac8cec59a4c618","task":"block"}
{"msg":"block from leader event successfully stored","level":"INFO","ts":"2020-01-30T08:49:43.005412100-08:00","date":"47.38883","parent":"b383538acac5df48c8d4a5789c37b1fd215ee3871fe4ae108d0fbdf3ee5fa51d","hash":"978fb9a6312f178273d929bd3628aa6168e21a9f11e5bbf56bac8cec59a4c618","task":"block"}
{"msg":"update current branch tip","level":"INFO","ts":"2020-01-30T08:49:43.006374600-08:00","date":"47.38883","parent":"b383538acac5df48c8d4a5789c37b1fd215ee3871fe4ae108d0fbdf3ee5fa51d","hash":"978fb9a6312f178273d929bd3628aa6168e21a9f11e5bbf56bac8cec59a4c618","task":"block"}
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:49:43.43 UTC] Applying blocks [47.38883 ... 47.38883]
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:49:43.43 UTC] Writing stake-distribution for epoch 47
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:50:24.10 UTC] Monitoring stake pools. Currently at b383538a-[47.38855#146725]
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:50:24.10 UTC] Applying blocks [47.38890 ... 47.38903]
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:50:24.11 UTC] Writing stake-distribution for epoch 47
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:50:34.15 UTC] Applying blocks [47.38907 ... 47.38907]
[cardano-wallet.stake-pool-monitor:Info:28] [2020-01-30 16:50:34.15 UTC] Writing stake-distribution for epoch 47
Date Time MyTip Tip
01-30-2020 08:48:20 146723 146722
01-30-2020 08:49:22 146725 146725
01-30-2020 08:50:23 146726 146726
01-30-2020 08:51:24 146729 146729
01-30-2020 08:52:26 146731 146729
Tracked under #1513
Describe the bug After creating a block with an existing parent, block not propagated to chain:
I run two nodes with leadership fail over and both nodes were fully sync and not forked as could be seen from my onw log files from a script were I compare last block height and hashes with Pooltool block height.
So block 145917, 145918 and 145919 were all on the chain and my node was scheduled for the next block: (grep 47.28047 node.out)
My node received the right parent:
b34273c3ba29f1d47e97438e8a39829659fe1a0804f2bb01ccbffb4a15be6ed7
and created a block:4a0d95e699e9a86c10f91ec510ba632b830730da599262156a126e2bfb88a726
. However on the chain blockb34273c3ba29f1d47e97438e8a39829659fe1a0804f2bb01ccbffb4a15be6ed7
had child42c6e9f03bd52c27c85ec32de2a86245444d6266ac98ed707f713ea8424a0516
and not my block. This block is also in slot 47.28056 which is not my scheduled slot 47.28047. Where is my block?Mandatory Information
jcli --full-version
output; jcli 0.8.8 (HEAD-4687999, release, linux [x86_64]) - [rustc 1.40.0 (73528e339 2019-12-16)]jormungandr --full-version
output; jormungandr 0.8.8 (HEAD-4687999, release, linux [x86_64]) - [rustc 1.40.0 (73528e339 2019-12-16)]To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Run Jormungandr 0.8.8 and create a block
Expected behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen. Blocks created succesfully should be on the chain
Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.