The licence file didn't actually contain a licence , this was causing github not to show the project as open source.
This text is from the daedalus repo where this is working correctly.
This is NOT a change to the intent of the licence per se , although its possible the licence might not have applied before having not been explicitly mentioned in this file.
Description
Linked issue
Type of change
[ ] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] 🛠 New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
[ ] 🏭 Refactoring that does not change existing functionality but does improve things like code readability, structure etc
[ ] 🔨 New or improved tests for existing code
[ ] ⛑ git-flow chore (backport, hotfix, etc)
Developer checklist
[ ] I have read the style guide document, and my code follows the code style of this project.
[ ] If my code deals with exceptions, it follows the guidelines.
[ ] I have updated any documentation accordingly, if needed. Documentation changes can be reflected in opening a PR on cardanodocs.com, amending the inline Haddock comments, any relevant README file or one of the document listed in the docs directory.
The licence file didn't actually contain a licence , this was causing github not to show the project as open source.
This text is from the daedalus repo where this is working correctly.
This is NOT a change to the intent of the licence per se , although its possible the licence might not have applied before having not been explicitly mentioned in this file.
Description
Linked issue
Type of change
Developer checklist
Testing checklist
QA Steps
Screenshots (if available)