nus-pe-bot
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
user story phrasing
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
User Story is unclear
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
From DG:
Perhaps the first User story is trying to address the search feature, hence it could have been written in this way to avoid confusion:
As a "student" i want to "search for modules by module code, name or faculty" so that i am able "to know the existing/available modules i can take during my semester"
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2223S1/pe-interim#25] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.Medium]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Changing the user story's phrasing wont change how we designed the product
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: This is not a duplicate. This is a separate issue, addressing the search feature's objective.
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: I still believe that the user story has not addressed the search feature's objective clearly. It addresses the addition of modules to planner instead.
It should be as follows : As a "student" i want to "search for modules by module code, name or faculty" so that i am able "to know the existing/available modules i can take during my semester"
:question: Issue severity
Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Medium]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: It should be Low instead.
Perhaps can be done in this way as currently the issue is not addresses clearly: