To avoid tough editorial decisions, the preferred sorting should IMHO be done by name.
That has the problem that projects might choose the same name, or just be the same project, but there are two forks of it (e.g. the QtSingleApplication from qt-solutions was forked by different people, and there are different copies around with the same name).
I'd like to have projects somehow namespaced in the typical com.example.foobar notation. This is what www.qpm.io does.
To avoid tough editorial decisions, the preferred sorting should IMHO be done by name.
That has the problem that projects might choose the same name, or just be the same project, but there are two forks of it (e.g. the QtSingleApplication from qt-solutions was forked by different people, and there are different copies around with the same name).
I'd like to have projects somehow namespaced in the typical
com.example.foobar
notation. This is what www.qpm.io does.