add AE example

[bzkrouse]

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

• Style this entry in a way that can be copied directly into NEWS.md. (#, @)

Provide more detail here as needed.

Reference GitHub issue associated with pull request. e.g., 'closes #' Resolves #209

---

Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

• [ ] All GitHub Action workflows pass with a :white_check_mark:
• [ ] PR branch has pulled the most recent updates from master branch: usethis::pr_merge_main()
• [ ] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
• [ ] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features (generally, 100% coverage for new code): devtools::test_coverage()
• [ ] Request a reviewer

Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)

• [ ] If a bug was fixed, a unit test was added.
• [ ] Run pkgdown::build_site(). Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website.
• [ ] Code coverage is suitable for any new functions/features: devtools::test_coverage()

When the branch is ready to be merged:

• [ ] Update NEWS.md with the changes from this pull request under the heading "# cards (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (see NEWS.md for examples).
• [ ] All GitHub Action workflows pass with a :white_check_mark:
• [ ] Approve Pull Request
• [ ] Merge the PR. Please use "Squash and merge" or "Rebase and merge".

[github-actions[bot]]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                       Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
---------------------------  -------  ------  -------  --------------------------
R/apply_fmt_fn.R                  95      24  74.74%   36-43, 109-116, 198-205
R/ard_attributes.R                35       1  97.14%   56
R/ard_categorical.R              342      16  95.32%   233, 393-394, 550-565, 599
R/ard_complex.R                   34       0  100.00%
R/ard_continuous.R               176       4  97.73%   118, 200-201, 299
R/ard_dichotomous.R               80       8  90.00%   62, 150-155, 178
R/ard_hierarchical.R              83       0  100.00%
R/ard_missing.R                   56       0  100.00%
R/ard_stack.R                     84       7  91.67%   107, 186-191
R/ard_total_n.R                    7       0  100.00%
R/as_nested_list.R                41       0  100.00%
R/bind_ard.R                      22       3  86.36%   51-53
R/check_ard_structure.R           39       6  84.62%   31, 55-59
R/default_stat_labels.R           18       0  100.00%
R/eval_capture_conditions.R       18       0  100.00%
R/get_ard_statistics.R            16       1  93.75%   75
R/nest_for_ard.R                  71       1  98.59%   60
R/print_ard_conditions.R          75      66  12.00%   60-176
R/print.R                         72       0  100.00%
R/process_selectors.R            125       1  99.20%   334
R/replace_null_statistic.R        11       0  100.00%
R/round5.R                         1       0  100.00%
R/selectors.R                     14       0  100.00%
R/shift_ard_columns.R             77      13  83.12%   61, 69, 144-147, 150-156
R/shuffle_ard.R                  102       0  100.00%
R/summary_functions.R             25       1  96.00%   59
R/tidy_ard_order.R                25       0  100.00%
R/tidy_as_ard.R                   39      11  71.79%   88-98
R/utils.R                         24       0  100.00%
TOTAL                           1807     163  90.98%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: e3184e4fb6063f09d1ebd6ee1ba41e6060077d72

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions[bot]]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   90 suites   13s :stopwatch:  88 tests  55 :white_check_mark: 33 :zzz: 0 :x: 178 runs  130 :white_check_mark: 48 :zzz: 0 :x:

Results for commit e3184e4f.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

[ddsjoberg]

@bzkrouse this is great, thank you for adding!

What do you think about simplifying the AE table to show either the patient-level OR the AE counts? I think the FDA specs separate them, right?

[bzkrouse]

@bzkrouse this is great, thank you for adding!

What do you think about simplifying the AE table to show either the patient-level OR the AE counts? I think the FDA specs separate them, right?

@ddsjoberg Made this update, please let me know what you think!