Closed aphalo closed 4 months ago
Thanks for the heads up @aphalo We'll double check again on our end.
Some unique scenario may have happened with that revdepcheck. I've tried replicating it as well as doing the recommended replacement method of tools::check_packages_in_dir()
and no errors nor stalls happened (as revdepcheck
is unmaintained).
revdepcheck::revdep_check(dependencies = "Suggests")
teal.modules.general
taking around 10minstools::check_packages_in_dir(".", reverse = list(repos = getOption("repos"), which = "Suggests"))
Tested with ggpp 0.5.7
, 0.5.8
and 0.5.8-2
Thanks for reporting and create a new issue if the issue reappears
ps. internally we are doing weekly testing with main version of all dependencies and that is passing: see max strategy
What happened?
Not really a bug, but I am about to submit 'ggpp' 0.5.7 to CRAN. Using 'revdepcheck' locally, the check of 'teal.modules.general' does not complete (has been now running for nearly 2 hours and continues). You may like to check that the new version of 'ggpp' does not break anything. I do not expect it to break anything. It does depend on 'ggplot2' >= 3.5.0 while your package depends on 'ggplot2' >= 3.4.0.
This is already a retry, so other reverse dependencies had already been checked good the day before.
sessionInfo()
No response
Relevant log output
No response
Code of Conduct
Contribution Guidelines
Security Policy