Closed kartikeyakirar closed 1 month ago
Filename Stmts Miss Cover Missing
---------------------- ------- ------ ------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/AddCardModule.R 146 2 98.63% 170, 207
R/ContentBlock.R 18 2 88.89% 57-63
R/DownloadModule.R 238 67 71.85% 98-104, 152, 183-188, 197-202, 205-210, 219-224, 227-232, 240-245, 248-253, 260-265, 268-273, 312-316
R/FileBlock.R 13 0 100.00%
R/LoadReporterModule.R 103 19 81.55% 100-105, 108-113, 119-124, 136
R/NewpageBlock.R 2 0 100.00%
R/PictureBlock.R 30 2 93.33% 20, 118
R/Previewer.R 372 95 74.46% 96-98, 101-102, 184-213, 217-219, 222, 289, 304, 306-309, 312, 315-323, 437-481
R/RcodeBlock.R 15 0 100.00%
R/Renderer.R 113 37 67.26% 97-112, 216, 224, 233, 235-256
R/ReportCard.R 84 3 96.43% 236, 241, 266
R/Reporter.R 107 6 94.39% 273-278
R/ResetModule.R 53 0 100.00%
R/SimpleReporter.R 32 0 100.00%
R/TableBlock.R 9 0 100.00%
R/TextBlock.R 13 0 100.00%
R/utils.R 126 86 31.75% 7, 38-97, 99, 102-109, 137, 161-169, 206-215
R/yaml_utils.R 81 2 97.53% 78, 289
R/zzz.R 14 10 28.57% 2-13, 19
TOTAL 1569 331 78.90%
Filename Stmts Miss Cover
---------- ------- ------ -------
R/utils.R -45 +6 -21.47%
TOTAL -45 +6 -0.96%
Results for commit: d493bd804d5552f19fa07ba2759b4c939ab72644
Minimum allowed coverage is 80%
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results
Test Suite | $Status$ | Time on main |
$±Time$ | $±Tests$ | $±Skipped$ | $±Failures$ | $±Errors$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Renderer | 💔 | $0.85$ | $+2.64$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
ReportCard | 💔 | $0.97$ | $+4.19$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
Reporter | 💔 | $1.80$ | $+1.92$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
TableBlock | 💔 | $1.32$ | $+13.68$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
utils | 💔 | $0.50$ | $+4.38$ | $-3$ | $0$ | $0$ | $0$ |
Results for commit 5314ea5a2bd59476c50b8a9d06157875c83b1f3a
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
CLA Assistant Lite bot ✅ All contributors have signed the CLA
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
@kartikeyakirar, how is this going? I think it is kind of ready isnt it? ^^
@Melkiades, I had paused work on this due to sprint priorities but have now resumed. The issue was addressed in the PR. We discussed the possibility of removing any calls to the flextable package and eliminating it from our imports. As a result, I've moved this to draft and am actively working on it.
Feasibility to remove any call from flextable pkg and remove it from import
I think i should have merged this and created a separate issue to remove flextable, to maintain momentum.
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
@Melkiades, I had paused work on this due to sprint priorities but have now resumed. The issue was addressed in the PR. We discussed the possibility of removing any calls to the flextable package and eliminating it from our imports. As a result, I've moved this to draft and am actively working on it.
Feasibility to remove any call from flextable pkg and remove it from import
I think i should have merged this and created a separate issue to remove flextable, to maintain momentum.
It is anyway imported by rtables function so I do not think it will make a lot of a difference
1 files 18 suites 37s :stopwatch: 189 tests 189 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x: 329 runs 329 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x:
Results for commit d493bd80.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
some tests for the functionality anyway?
done 800d071
partially fixes :https://github.com/insightsengineering/teal.reporter/issues/258
feasibility to remove any call from flextable pkg and remove it from import