add wrapper for wait_for_value for output value.

[kartikeyakirar]

This PR introduces a wrapper for the wait_for_value method, specifically designed for output values.

[m7pr]

ignore my previous comment!

[github-actions[bot]]

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                          Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
------------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R/dummy_functions.R                  30      21  30.00%   21-33, 36-43
R/get_rcode_utils.R                  31       1  96.77%   50
R/include_css_js.R                   22       0  100.00%
R/init.R                             86      31  63.95%   108-115, 161-162, 164, 176-197, 227-228, 230
R/landing_popup_module.R             25      25  0.00%    61-87
R/module_filter_manager.R           107      36  66.36%   37-43, 50-58, 67-72, 195, 200-213
R/module_nested_tabs.R              154      58  62.34%   39-112, 128, 180, 202, 228
R/module_snapshot_manager.R         209     157  24.88%   87-99, 127-136, 140-152, 154-161, 168-182, 186-188, 190-195, 198-208, 211-227, 236-251, 265-288, 291-302, 305-311, 325, 343-366
R/module_tabs_with_filters.R         76      33  56.58%   33-68, 100, 116
R/module_teal_with_splash.R         114       4  96.49%   110, 131, 197-198
R/module_teal.R                     106      29  72.64%   57, 68, 77, 150-151, 157, 176-207
R/modules.R                         152      26  82.89%   127-130, 147-151, 206-209, 291-292, 344, 356-364, 418-421
R/reporter_previewer_module.R        18       2  88.89%   30, 34
R/show_rcode_modal.R                 19      19  0.00%    17-36
R/tdata.R                            53       1  98.11%   154
R/teal_data_module-eval_code.R       27       0  100.00%
R/teal_data_module-within.R           7       0  100.00%
R/teal_data_module.R                  6       0  100.00%
R/teal_reporter.R                    62       5  91.94%   69, 118-119, 122, 139
R/teal_slices-store.R                29       0  100.00%
R/teal_slices.R                      59      12  79.66%   137-150
R/TealAppDriver.R                   244     244  0.00%    29-506
R/utils.R                           173       1  99.42%   255
R/validate_inputs.R                  32       0  100.00%
R/validations.R                      58      37  36.21%   110-377
R/zzz.R                              12       8  33.33%   3-15
TOTAL                              1911     750  60.75%

Diff against main

Filename             Stmts    Miss  Cover
-----------------  -------  ------  --------
R/TealAppDriver.R      +10     +10  +100.00%
TOTAL                  +10     +10  -0.32%

Results for commit: d8a3352a91e5fe27ac92814997f2d8664f3682b8

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions[bot]]

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files   28 suites   2m 1s :stopwatch: 234 tests 234 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x: 497 runs  497 :white_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x:

Results for commit d8a3352a.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions[bot]]

Unit Test Performance Difference

Test Suite	$Status$	Time on main	$±Time$	$±Tests$	$±Skipped$	$±Failures$	$±Errors$
shinytest2-filter_panel	💚	$20.11$	$-6.72$	$-2$	$0$	$0$	$+2$

Additional test case details

| Test Suite | $Status$ | Time on `main` | $±Time$ | Test Case | |:-----|:----:|:----:|:----:|:-----| | shinytest2-filter_panel | 💚 | $7.32$ | $-3.33$ | e2e_filtering_a_module_specific_filter_is_not_refected_in_other_unshared_modules | | shinytest2-filter_panel | 💚 | $7.18$ | $-3.20$ | e2e_filtering_a_module_specific_filter_is_refected_in_other_shared_module |

Results for commit 767a7c2672eb47530d3da1d40deaa08d9ee87e1d

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[kartikeyakirar]

Consider reducing the logic on this wrapper and just passing modified input/output/export and leave the deep checks to the parent method

I like this idea, thanks @averissimo! Do you think we should use self$get_active_module_input(input) instead of ns(input)? Also, we need to introduce the self$get_active_module_export method. WDYT?

[averissimo]

~Yes, we should! Great catch~

[kartikeyakirar]

Following our discussion with @averissimo, it appears that self$get_activemodule... methods are not useful as they return a value that is not being used. However, I have added the rest of the great suggestions here: a2f4392.