Open jmartinm opened 8 years ago
For this to show relevant information, the Journals database should be cleaned to separate all journals like Physical Review B, Physical Review C, Physical Review D into individual records (currently we only have one record)
We should again call it h(HEP) index.
Would be good to wait until we have moved letters from volumes to journal names. Otherwise, journals with multiple subsidies like Phys Rev are at a severe disadvantage compared e.g. with JHEP.
On 07 Jun 2016, at 11:26, Javier Martin Montull notifications@github.com wrote:
Based on the data present on INSPIRE, the journals landing page can have the following info:
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/580727/15855989/34956efa-2cb3-11e6-8257-b0eb2361d457.png We already have a function that calculates h-index. We need to pass through an array of all papers from that journal with their citation counts to that function.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/inspirehep/inspire-next/issues/1184, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AM1-O6BWePuycHgW3HgNLbIOw60m0vnTks5qJVVVgaJpZM4Iv0eK.
it's neat that Google Scholar includes arXiv categories in their list.
...and this is another future user of https://github.com/inspirehep/inspire-next/blob/3a40fbfb3ad21b769022136067b755e295ca1e76/inspirehep/utils/stats.py
Based on the data present on INSPIRE, the journals landing page could have the following info (see GScholar example https://scholar.google.nl/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=phy)
We already have a function that calculates h-index. We need to pass through an array of all papers from that journal with their citation counts to that function.