Closed david-caro closed 7 years ago
For our own reference: https://sentry.cern.ch/inspire-sentry/inspire-labs-qa/group/601676/events/136845158/
They should just be split into 2 fields
Agreed, each experiment should get its own field.
and I've done that now for this record.
this is being taken care of by systematic analysis of migration failures.
Currently we have some authors that have multiple 693__e values, see:
https://inspirehep.net/record/1058096/export/xm
Should it be like this? Should we expect this field to have more than one entry? (maybe the author was working on more than one experiment at the same time?)
Thanks!