Closed tsgit closed 6 years ago
Actually I just tried it and the output was:
[{'captions': [u'In the top row: the ratio of the pairwise velocity, $v_{12}$, between the R-FLRW simulations and the main $\\Lambda$CDM run at fixed separation $r = 5$ Mpc/h for four different redshifts. In the second and third row: the same ratio calculated for $\\sigma_{||}$ and $\\sigma_{12}$ respectively. The error bars show the 1-$\\sigma$ uncertainty calculated using a bootstrap technique. The same ratios are also calculated for two additional $\\Lambda$CDM runs with the same $\\sigma_8$ value at redshift $z=0$ of each R-FLRW simulation, represented as colored bands enclosing the 1-$\\sigma$ region around each measurement.'],
'label': u'fig:s8compar',
'name': 'figures_allthree_sigma8_newlayout',
'original_url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/allthree_sigma8_newlayout.png',
'url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/allthree_sigma8_newlayout.png'},
{'captions': [u'Clockwise from the top left: The mean inward radial pairwise velocity, $v_{12}$, the correlation function, $\\xi(r)$, the mean dispersion in the radial pairwise velocity, $\\sigma_{||}$ and the line of sight dispersion, $\\sigma_{12}$, all as a function of halo mass for two physical separations, $r = 1$ Mpc/h and $r = 5$ Mpc/h, for all the simulations in our suite. \\refresponsestart{}The mass is the average mass in the five mass bins in which we split the halo catalog. Pairs are restricted to halos within the same halo mass bin, as described in Section~\\ref{sec:dmhalosvel}.\\refresponseend{}~ In the bottom panels we plot the residuals with respect to the reference $\\Lambda$CDM simulation.'],
'label': u'fig:fourplots',
'name': 'figures_sp_mbin_2',
'original_url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/sp_mbin_2.png',
'url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/sp_mbin_2.png'},
{'captions': [u'Clockwise from the top left: The mean inward radial pairwise velocity, $v_{12}$, the correlation function, $\\xi(r)$, the mean dispersion in the radial pairwise velocity, $\\sigma_{||}$ and the line of sight dispersion, $\\sigma_{12}$, all as a function of halo mass for two physical separations, $r = 1$ Mpc/h and $r = 5$ Mpc/h, for all the simulations in our suite. \\refresponsestart{}The mass is the average mass in the five mass bins in which we split the halo catalog. Pairs are restricted to halos within the same halo mass bin, as described in Section~\\ref{sec:dmhalosvel}.\\refresponseend{}~ In the bottom panels we plot the residuals with respect to the reference $\\Lambda$CDM simulation.'],
'label': u'fig:fourplots',
'name': 'figures_s12_mbin_2',
'original_url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/s12_mbin_2.png',
'url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/s12_mbin_2.png'},
{'captions': [u'The ratio of the pairwise velocity, and the dispersions, $\\sigma_{||}$ and $\\sigma_{12}$ , between the CoDECS simulations and the main $\\Lambda$CDM run at fixed separation $r = 5$ Mpc/h at redshift $z=0$. The error bars show the 1-$\\sigma$ uncertainty calculated using a bootstrap technique. Each statistic is also calculated for three additional $\\Lambda$CDM runs with the same $\\sigma_8$ value at redshift $z=0$ as the CoDECS scenarios EXP002, EXP003 and EXP008e3, represented as colored bands enclosing the 1-$\\sigma$ region around each measurement.'],
'label': u'fig:codecs',
'name': 'figures_codecs_allthre_lines_2',
'original_url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/codecs_allthre_lines_2.png',
'url': '/tmp/1701.04453_files/figures/codecs_allthre_lines_2.png'}]
so the problematic-path figures have been skipped. This is not good.
I see bibsched error in FFT from figures with
//
in their pathlooking at the unpacked TeX source file:
the
includegraphics
command has argumentfigures//v12_particles_3.png
whichgraphics
package properly handlesso I gather somewhere plotextract should do
os.path.normpath()
on the detected figure inclusionsfull FFT message