codecov[bot]
commented
9 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
c4a8193) 99.12% compared to head (197c10b) 99.12%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #411 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 99.12% 99.12% ======================================= Files 88 88 Lines 8989 8989 ======================================= Hits 8910 8910 Misses 79 79 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/instrumentkit/InstrumentKit/pull/411/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=instrumentkit) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/instrumentkit/InstrumentKit/pull/411/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=instrumentkit) | `99.12% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=instrumentkit#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Ok, last one for #406: Updating
pytestandhypothesisto the latest versions. Also added a missing__init__.pyfile, whichpytestcomplained about is missing due to the change in8.0.0of test collection.As discussed in #406, these dependencies are still pinned to minor versions, however, to new ones. Should keep us future proof for a while longer.
Looks like all passing and good. Closes #406