Closed mcarson28 closed 1 year ago
It looks like for Creating a GL entry COSTTYPEID
is missing as well from the SDK.
@mcarson28 / @tehnorm, we can add missing fields :) please let us know of more fields that are missing which your respective teams would like to use so we can add them. Also, thanks for letting us know!
The missing field I was referring to was the following from the Vendor API Docs
APACCOUNT | Optional | string | Default expense GL account number
@dylan-holt-sage it might make sense to audit the API's vs what is in this lib? I needed GL entry COSTTYPEID
but there seem to be many others to be added.
@dylan-holt-sage also, I don't see description on order entry. Is that something that could be added?
@tehnorm / @mcarson28, I'll see what I can do from the audit perspective. May take some time since .NET SDK is next priority. I'll add everything that's explicitly been mentioned for the upcoming release and plan other items for when there is time. Sorry for the delay
@mcarson28 , which description on order entry are you referring to? The PCB related descriptions? Subtotals has the subtotal descriptions there.
Hi there,
I've got two queries I was hoping you could help me with.
I need to create transactions that multiple lines, with different tax solutions on each, however, I can't seem to find the related tax fields that will enable me to do this. Is there a way of me creating them?
The other query I have is in relation to creating advances (payments on account). I'm also unable to find documentation on how to go about this through the NodeJS SDK. Is this something that already exists or is it possible for to create this?
@johnsonj081, Advances haven't been added to this SDK yet. Please raise a new issue stating that and I'll make a task for implementing it.
For your first item, can you give me more details in a new issue? What type of transaction(s)?
Please use the following URLs to see what we offer vs what is in the SDK. Supported in Intacct production: https://developer.intacct.com/api/ Supported in Intacct NodeJS SDK: https://intacct.github.io/intacct-sdk-js/index.html
Hi Dylan,
I appreciate your response. I've logged the requirement for advances as an issue now.
As for my first issue raised, I'm going to run some tests just to be 100% sure on which transactions will require tax information, and which tax data points will actually be required. Once I've completed this I'll raise a separate issue in GitHub.
Kind regards, Jamie
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 15:05, Dylan Holt @.***> wrote:
@johnsonj081 https://github.com/johnsonj081, Advances haven't been added to this SDK yet. Please raise a new issue stating that and I'll make a task for implementing it.
For your first item, can you give me more details in a new issue? What type of transaction(s)? Please use the following URLs to see what we offer vs what is in the SDK. Supported in Intacct production: https://developer.intacct.com/api/ Supported in Intacct NodeJS SDK: https://intacct.github.io/intacct-sdk-js/index.html
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/intacct/intacct-sdk-js/issues/76#issuecomment-1289088804, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJWP7XDAF42ONLNXKIO2PBTWE2JRDANCNFSM5FMJF7QQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hi Dylan,
I can confirm that the data points we need are for invoices and adjustments on both the AP and AR side. For each line within each of these transactions, we need to be able to add Tax Solutions, Tax Detail ID's and Tax Amounts.
Just for some context, I am an employee of ION. We're a partner with Sage and this piece of work is essential to completing an implementation that is currently in progress.
Kind regards, Jamie
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 16:16, James Ward-Johnson @.***> wrote:
Hi Dylan,
I appreciate your response. I've logged the requirement for advances as an issue now.
As for my first issue raised, I'm going to run some tests just to be 100% sure on which transactions will require tax information, and which tax data points will actually be required. Once I've completed this I'll raise a separate issue in GitHub.
Kind regards, Jamie
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 15:05, Dylan Holt @.***> wrote:
@johnsonj081 https://github.com/johnsonj081, Advances haven't been added to this SDK yet. Please raise a new issue stating that and I'll make a task for implementing it.
For your first item, can you give me more details in a new issue? What type of transaction(s)? Please use the following URLs to see what we offer vs what is in the SDK. Supported in Intacct production: https://developer.intacct.com/api/ Supported in Intacct NodeJS SDK: https://intacct.github.io/intacct-sdk-js/index.html
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/intacct/intacct-sdk-js/issues/76#issuecomment-1289088804, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJWP7XDAF42ONLNXKIO2PBTWE2JRDANCNFSM5FMJF7QQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Is it possible to add missing fields that are in the native api but not the nodejs SDK? For example offsetGLAccount for Vendors is available in the API but not on the SDK.